What In the Theological Place of Eternal Damnation???? Now the White House Views Unborn Babies As Human

Remember when Obama told Rick Warren that deciding when an unborn child gets human rights was above his pay grade?

Well apparently someone at the White House has a higher pay grade than Obama because according to a story in the Washington Free Beacon, the "White House Visitors Office requires that an unborn child—still residing in utero—must be counted as a full human being when its parents register for a White House tour."

You got that right, that same unborn baby that Obama said he couldn't determine was human, the same unborn baby that the Obama administration sees as only a blob of tissue & thus fair game for any & every abortionist in the country has ruled that they are a seperate human being when the expectant mother tours the White House.
According to the Free Beacon story, the Visitors Office "MUST include the baby in the overall count of guests in the tour."

The process is as follows:

"LAST NAME: The family’s last name

FIRST NAME: “Baby” as a first name

MIDDLE NAME: NMN as in No Middle Name

DOB: Use the date you are submitting the request to us as their birthday

GENDER: if the parents know put that gender down if not, you can enter either M or F as we’ll ask you to update it at the time of birth

SOCIAL: As they will not have a SSN and are under 18, you will not need to enter this field. Again if the spreadsheet asked for a social enter 9 zero’s (not the word nine zeros but 000000000 and yes it happens!)

CITIZEN/CITY/STATE: The citizen, city and state should be entered the same as the parents"

I have no idea why the requirement is in place to count an unborn child, or how long it has been in effect. But doesn't it it seem a little more that bizarre that this is the only time a governmental agency recognizes an unborn child as a speperate human being?

Well, I guess they see it as already being born & hiding out in the mother's womb since it requires the date of submission of the name as the birthday. Following that logic, the only reason I can come up with is that the White House is gathering a list of potential pro-life terrorists who may be using their mother's womb to smuggle a bomb in the White House. After all, we know how dangerous the Obama administration views pro-lifers as. OK, I am being a bit facetious, but can anyone come up with a better explanation? (Besides inflaiting the visitor numbers?)

Of course once the child leaves the White House, then, miracle of miracles, it is no longer a human being & again fair game for any abortionist.

If someone had given this scenerio to Rod Serling as a Twilight Zone episode, he would have rejected it as too bizarre even for that show.

PS: Given that 2011 White House Staff List doesn't show anyone getting paid more than Obama, it then raises another question, is Obama overpaid???? (Yes, that is rhetorical) One thing it does show is the hypocricy of the Obama administration when it talks about women getting equal pay.  The Free Beacon reports: According to the 2011 annual report on White House staff, female employees earned a median annual salary of $60,000, which was about 18 percent less than the median salary for male employees ($71,000)." While there may be some good reasons for the disparity, like types of jobs, senority, etc, the Obama administration has ignored those facts when it attacks other businesses for similar disparities.

This is just more proof that we cannot allow Obama to continue in office.

H/T :Creative Minority Report, Matthew Archbold  (Pro-Abort White House Counts Unborn as People on Tours)

See also: White House: Abortion OK, But Visitors Must Register Unborn Children

Congressman “Applauds” Obama for “Changing” Abortion Stance