A Tale of 2 Bishops
BOSTON, January 14, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Following directions from Cardinal Sean O’Malley, the Archdiocese of Boston has formulated a Catholic schools admission policy that prohibits “discrimination” against students who come from a homosexual household, a move that has won praise from dissident “Catholic” gay rights leaders. Last year Archbishop Chaput decided differently for Catholic schools in his diocese saying: “Most parents who send their children to Catholic schools want an environment where the Catholic faith is fully taught and practiced. That simply can’t be done if teachers need to worry about wounding the feelings of their students or about alienating students from their parents.”
The new policy was sparked by the decision of Boston’s St. Paul’s elementary school last May to withdraw acceptance of a student after learning the child was guarded by two women in a lesbian relationship. The archdiocese subsequently distanced itself from the decision.
That decision occurred only weeks after a school within the Archdiocese of Denver also rejected the application of a student guarded by a lesbian couple. Denver Archbishop Charles Chaput supported the school’s action. “The Church does not claim that people with a homosexual orientation are ‘bad,’ or that their children are less loved by God. Quite the opposite,” he explained.
“But what the Church does teach is that sexual intimacy by anyone outside marriage is wrong; that marriage is a sacramental covenant; and that marriage can only occur between a man and a woman. These beliefs are central to a Catholic understanding of human nature, family and happiness, and the organization of society.”
In announcing the new Boston policy, Cardinal O’Malley said that the archdiocese has “never had categories of people who were excluded” and that “Catholic schools exist for the good of the children and our admission standards must reflect that.”
“While there are legitimate reasons that might lead to a decision not to admit a child, I believe all would agree that the good of the child must always be our primary concern,” wrote O’Malley on his blog.
Archbishop Chaput concluded that since Catholic schools owe Catholic students the full teaching of the truth and children being brought up by homosexual couples could be hurt by the teachings, allowing them into Catholic schools “isn’t fair to anyone—including the wider school community.”
Boston Vicar General and Moderator of the Curia Father Richard Erikson confirmed that, “We will not exclude any category of child from our schools and we expect pastors will be in conformity with the decision,” in remarks published by the Boston Pilot this week.
The new policy does not specify the meaning of a “category” of students. Secretary for Education Mary Grassa O’Neill declined to state how the policy would have affected last year’s case.
The dissident group Catholics for Equality hailed the new Boston archdiocesan policy on its Facebook page as “a good news story.” “Let’s work to implement similar policies in Catholic schools nationwide!” said the group, half of whose board members hold leading positions at the top homosexualist group Human Rights Campaign.
2 Comments:
At 15/1/11 6:12 PM , John said...
Al,
I apologize if you consider this an intrusion, but I wanted to respond to the comments you left on Paul's blog.
To refresh your memory, this is what I said about Michael Voris:
"The man seemingly doesn't believe in democracy, and I can't believe that anyone who could say that a Catholic monarchy is the best possible type of government could have any sort of allegiance to this republic."
I stand by those comments. Michael Voris does not seem to believe in democracy ("if we insist" on electing officials, he wants to exclude non-Catholics from voting and he argues for the institution of a Catholic monarchy), and he obviously has no loyalty to this republic. I've tried to see how I could be guilty of cherry picking or taking the man's comments out of context, but I just can't: he speaks plainly and to the point. If you still diagree with me after viewing the following two clips, I sure would be interested in reading why.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYCsrhJPIfY&feature=related
Michael"Western civilization would be better off it were a Catholic monarchy"
Thanks,
John
At 16/1/11 12:32 AM , Al said...
John
1st of all, I am familiar with that clip. I subscribe to his channel on YouTube & I am on RealCatholic's e-mail list as well. I remember well when it came out. & what he said in other videos as well.
I find it interesting that you link to the reposting of that video on a different person's YouTube channel, rather than his posting of it on his channel. What that person failed to do is post the follow up video where he clarified some of the things he said in that video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rl-S5BBK86I
Did you even bother to go over to his channel & listen to any other videos including the follow up I put the link up for? Or, as it now looks to me to be the reality, have you just listened to this 1?
If you did just look at the 1 video at neotrpoic9, then yes, you did cherry pick because it is clear the person who reposted the video did just that. The person says under "About Me": "I am an atheist, feminist, environmentalist, secularist, socialist, humanist, antitheist, and probably some other things I can't think of right now." Sounds to me like he/she clearly has an agenda. & doesn't like what Voris is saying in upholding Catholic teaching.
Maybe you better be careful not to judge based on 1 video.
LarryD knows Voris as he said, I have met him & heard him speak myself. I watch his videos & know what he stands for. & as I said before, your using only 1 video & then 1 from someone else's channel shows me that you are cherry picking. &probably are intentiona lly refusing to check out the whole truth.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home