Obama Kissing Up to Islam Using Some Lies
The fifth point is religious freedom. Here Obama goes a little beyond historic truth and uses mythical concepts to justify his position. He maintains that Islam has always been a tolerant religion. But this is ambiguous: religious freedom is not only a question of tolerance. Tolerance means allowing others to exist, it does not mean freedom of speech, freedom to preach or convert. Then he falls into the trap of myths when he uses the Caliphate of Andalusia and Cordoba a san example of this tolerance, placing it in direct contrast to the Inquisition. This is completely exaggerated myth. First of all the Inquisition was historically after the caliphate, but the affirmation is also wrong in its contents. There was a lot of persecution under the Andalusia Caliphate, of Christians, Jews and even Muslims: Averroè was forced to flee from Cordoba; the same fate for the Hebrew Philosopher Maimonide. He then points to Indonesia where he lived during his childhood. And here there is little to argue about. However the Indonesia of today is less tolerant than it was in the past. Despite this he seems conscious of the fact that steps need to be taken to ensure reciprocal respect. Among situations of difficulty he lists (a little out of place) the Maronites in Lebanon and (with no small measure of courage given that he is in Egypt) the Copts in Egypt. Finally he also cites conflicts between Sunni and Shiites to show that tolerance is needed also among Muslims themselves and not only with Christians.
In concluding, Fr. Samir compares Obama's message in Egypt to the message presented by Pope Benedict XVI during his recent trip to the Middle East:
Comparing his message to that of the Pope during his trip to the Holy Land, it seems to me, that with regards the Palestinians, the pope was far less ambiguous. Both defended the right of Israel to exist, both condemned the violence, but Benedict XVI spoke in precise terms of the Two States; he even said that the security barrier is unacceptable and that Jerusalem has to be the capital of both States. Obama instead only spoke of Jerusalem as the “spiritual capital” of the three Abrahamic religions.The pope also spoke of the “indestructible bonds” between Jews and Christians, but did not justify these bonds with a weak historic motivation.It must also be said that the pope’s situation was far more delicate, because Benedict XVI went into the eye of the storm, among the Israelis and Palestinians. Instead this speech by Obama only served to please Islam.
Also see a May 14, 2009, column by Fr. Samir, "The Pope, Arabic Islam and the West".And speaking of religious tolerance, this interview with Coptic Orthodox priest Fr. Zakaria Botros (labeled "one of the most wanted infidels in the world" by al Qaeda) offers a harrowing glimpse into the daunting (and sometimes deadly) situations faced by many Christians living in the Middle East. Finally, Tom Hoopes of National Catholic Register points out "3 Things Obama Didn't Say" in the Cairo speech, including his failure to promote LGBT lifestyles as he has in the United States by declaring June to be "LGBT Pride Month".
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home