More Proof the ACLU Is Undermining, Not Upholding the 1st Amendment
So much for the "Free expression" clause.
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- The ACLU has filed a suit against the Bush administration for allowing taxpayer funding of a Catholic program that spares women abortions. The pro-abortion law firm sued the Department of Health and Human Services over allowing the Catholic bishops to institute a pro-life policy. Like I said, so much for the "free expression" clause.
Since 2006, the health department has allowed the U.S. Conference of Catholic bishops to limit the kind of services it offers women who are sex trafficking victims under the grant money it receives through the Trafficking Victims Protection Act.
Through the Act, the federal government distributes funds to cover an array of services needed by the more than 14,000 individuals, mostly women, who are victimized by commercial sex trafficking. Never mind that these women have already been victimized, the ACLU wants them to be victimized anew by the abortion industry. Rather than healing the ACLU wants to add to the emotional damage already done to them.
Some of the women who are sold into prostitution become pregnant and many have abortions without abortion businesses doing any checking to find out if the abortion is pressured or coerced. A dirty secret the "culture of death" doesn't want out, how many women are really pressured or coerced into an abortion.
Sensitive to how women are exploited, the Catholic bishops, who have their own program to help these victims, prohibit any subcontractors from using the funds to pay for or promote abortions. Instead, the Catholic bishops provides comprehensive case management services to survivors including medical and mental health services. & while there have been some failures, for the most part, it does prevent the women from further exploitation by the abortion industry.
The issue came up when officials with the Commonwealth Catholic Charities in Richmond, Virginia came under fire for signing a parental consent form for an abortion for a teenager. 1 of the times it actually has failed.
The ACLU sought information in the case from the federal government in November and filed suit today saying the HHS was wrong to allow the Catholic groups to institute the no-abortion policy.
Brigitte Amiri, staff attorney with the ACLU, said in a statement that the policy denies sex trafficking victims "the full range of needed services, including" abortion. So, murdering an unborn child is now a service not the denial of his/her right to life?
Daniel Mach, a litigation director, went further and claimed "the Bush administration has sanctioned the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops' blatant misuse of taxpayer dollars."
"It has allowed USCCB to impose its religious beliefs on trafficking victims by prohibiting sub grantees from ensuring access to services like ... abortion," he added. But Sister Mary Ann Walsh of the bishops' conference responded that women who seek help from the Catholic Church receive the best care available."The problem of trafficking in this country is huge and serious and the Catholic Church has the best network of services bar none," she said. "Going to the Catholic Church for social services is very logical." Especially since they will (usually) provide for both the mother & child what is best for both of them.
According to the ACLU, since April 2006, HHS, which administers funds allocated by the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act, has awarded USCCB grants ranging from $2.5 million to $3.5 million annually to support organizations that provide direct services to trafficking victims.
HHS spokesman Kenneth Wolfe has previously talked about the funds in question and said they were intended to help victims, not secure abortions.
"These federal funds are awarded with the clear purpose of caring for unaccompanied minors here from other countries," Wolfe said, adding that they are not "to facilitate ... procuring an abortion."
The case is ACLU of Massachusetts v. Leavitt and was in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts because a Massachusetts group that helps such women is one of the contractors the USCCB works with in the state.
Since 2006, the health department has allowed the U.S. Conference of Catholic bishops to limit the kind of services it offers women who are sex trafficking victims under the grant money it receives through the Trafficking Victims Protection Act.
Through the Act, the federal government distributes funds to cover an array of services needed by the more than 14,000 individuals, mostly women, who are victimized by commercial sex trafficking. Never mind that these women have already been victimized, the ACLU wants them to be victimized anew by the abortion industry. Rather than healing the ACLU wants to add to the emotional damage already done to them.
Some of the women who are sold into prostitution become pregnant and many have abortions without abortion businesses doing any checking to find out if the abortion is pressured or coerced. A dirty secret the "culture of death" doesn't want out, how many women are really pressured or coerced into an abortion.
Sensitive to how women are exploited, the Catholic bishops, who have their own program to help these victims, prohibit any subcontractors from using the funds to pay for or promote abortions. Instead, the Catholic bishops provides comprehensive case management services to survivors including medical and mental health services. & while there have been some failures, for the most part, it does prevent the women from further exploitation by the abortion industry.
The issue came up when officials with the Commonwealth Catholic Charities in Richmond, Virginia came under fire for signing a parental consent form for an abortion for a teenager. 1 of the times it actually has failed.
The ACLU sought information in the case from the federal government in November and filed suit today saying the HHS was wrong to allow the Catholic groups to institute the no-abortion policy.
Brigitte Amiri, staff attorney with the ACLU, said in a statement that the policy denies sex trafficking victims "the full range of needed services, including" abortion. So, murdering an unborn child is now a service not the denial of his/her right to life?
Daniel Mach, a litigation director, went further and claimed "the Bush administration has sanctioned the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops' blatant misuse of taxpayer dollars."
"It has allowed USCCB to impose its religious beliefs on trafficking victims by prohibiting sub grantees from ensuring access to services like ... abortion," he added. But Sister Mary Ann Walsh of the bishops' conference responded that women who seek help from the Catholic Church receive the best care available."The problem of trafficking in this country is huge and serious and the Catholic Church has the best network of services bar none," she said. "Going to the Catholic Church for social services is very logical." Especially since they will (usually) provide for both the mother & child what is best for both of them.
According to the ACLU, since April 2006, HHS, which administers funds allocated by the federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act, has awarded USCCB grants ranging from $2.5 million to $3.5 million annually to support organizations that provide direct services to trafficking victims.
HHS spokesman Kenneth Wolfe has previously talked about the funds in question and said they were intended to help victims, not secure abortions.
"These federal funds are awarded with the clear purpose of caring for unaccompanied minors here from other countries," Wolfe said, adding that they are not "to facilitate ... procuring an abortion."
The case is ACLU of Massachusetts v. Leavitt and was in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts because a Massachusetts group that helps such women is one of the contractors the USCCB works with in the state.
Related web sites:
USCCB Anti-Trafficking Per Capita Services Program -
posted by Al @ 12:06 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home