Is Anybody There?

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Not by might, nor by power, but by my Spirit,' says Yahweh Sabaoth" Zach 4:6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dio di Signore, nella Sua volontà è nostra pace!" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Ben Franklin 1759

Sunday, September 17, 2006

Happy 219th Birthday!!!! US Constitution

Today marks the day in 1787 on which the Constitution of the United States of America was signed by the delegates to the convention that had created it. Actually, I should say signed by those who supported it in their final form. There were some, who for reasons they felt were good refused to sign it. Among the complaints was the lack of a bill of rights. This was later corrected by the passing of the 1st 10 Amendments we now call the Bill of Rights.
Ben Franklin prepared a speech for that last day which he had Judge James Wilson give for him. He talked about his concerns that it wasn't perfect. He said: "I doubt too whether any other Convention we can obtain, may be able to make a better Constitution." This he said was due to the weaknesses that are inherant in any group of men gathered together for such a purpose. But then he went on to say that despite what he perceived as flaws: "It therefore astonishes me, Sir, to find this system approaching so near to perfection as it does." He continued: "Thus I consent, Sir, to this Constitution because I expect no better, and because I am not sure, that it is not the best. The opinions I have had of its errors, I sacrifice to the public good."
He is also reported as saying at the end that in viewing the chair that George Washington sat on he often wondered if the carving on its back was a rising or setting sun. "I now see that it is a rising sun."
There are some valid concerns about how faithful we are being to the Constitution these days. I've talked about Judge Napolitano's books on the Constitution & highly recomend them. There are 2 other books I would suggest that will help you to understand what the real meaning of the Constitution is. They are both available in inexpensive paperback editions. The 1st & most important is The Federalist Papers. This book is a collection of the series of articles written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton & John Jay to explain the meaning of the Constitution & to answer the objections of those in New York opposing that state's ratification of the Constitution. The paperback edition that I like is edited by Clinton Rossiter & is published by Penguin Group (USA) Inc. (ISBN: 0451528816). The 2nd is The Anti-Federalist Papers & the Constitutional Convention Debates. The edition I use is Published by Penguin Group (USA) Inc. (ISBN: 0451528840), edited by Ralph Ketcham & is crossed referenced to the edition of The Federalist Papers that I use. This book has a cross-selection of the various articles written to oppose the Constitution as well as a summary of the various debates during the Convention. As I pointed out it is cross referenced to the other edition, making it easy to look at both sides of the debate. They also contain the Declaration of Independence & the Constitution of the United States of America. There are also many inexpensive editions of just the Declaration & Constitution out there.
A few years ago Congress passed a law that requires all schools from grade to college to celebrate Constitution Day (18 Septemebr this year because today is a Sunday.). This law was a result of the unfortunant tendancy in recent years to gloss over the study of it in schools. It is a start. We need to have a better undertanding of why the Constitution came about. If not, we will not stand up for its proper implimentation by Congress, the President, the Courts & the States. We also need to get back to knowing its foundations in natural law.
The other thing needed is for our country to return to being a religious people. John Adams said that this is the only way it could ever function properly. The reason is, a non-religious people would deny the foundation in natural law since that comes from a creator. Without acknowledging a Supreme Being we won't acknowledge the rest. George Washington knew that he had to rely on God to properly exercise his duties as president. That is why he added "So help me God." at the end of the oath when he was 1st sworn in as president. Thomas Jefferson regularly attended religious services on Sundays. When asked why he replied that it was his duty as president to set a good example. The Founding Fathers wanted to prevent an official state church. They never wanted, despite what many people claim today, to remove it from the public discourse. If they did the 1st Amendement wouldn't begin with: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". (Emphasis mine.) Free exercise includes using it as a basis for supporting laws.
Our Founding Fathers, & Mothers for that matter, would be shocked by how some are trying to use them to drive religion from the public discourse. They would be upset by how many other areas of the Constitution we have allowed to be undermined. It is time we returned to our roots. I thank God for the blessings of our Constitution that enables us to: "form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity" (Constitution) so that we could "assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them." (Declaration)
National Archives short history of the writing & ratifying of the Constitution:
http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/constitution_history.html
Ben Franklin's speech:

2 Comments:

  • At 19/11/06 4:25 PM , Blogger Ray Soller said...

    You noted in your blog that "George Washington knew that he had to rely on God to properly exercise his duties as president."

    The case is just the opposite. Washington knew that the Constitution, Aticle VI.3, specified, "no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States."

    In spite of the widespread notion to the contrary, there is absolutely no contemporary historical evidence that supports the notion of George Washington saying anything other than his oath of office as prescribed by the Constitution.

     
  • At 20/11/06 4:59 AM , Blogger Al said...

    Rather than respond in my own words I'll let George Washington reply with some quotes from his 1st innaugural address to prove the lie that is rumble spiel's claim.

    "Such being the impressions under which I have, in obedience to the public summons, repaired to the present station, it would be peculiarly improper to omit in this first official act my fervent supplications to that Almighty Being who rules over the universe, who presides in the councils of nations, and whose providential aids can supply every human defect, that His benediction may consecrate to the liberties and happiness of the people of the United States a Government instituted by themselves for these essential purposes, and may enable every instrument employed in its administration to execute with success the functions allotted to his charge. In tendering this homage to the Great Author of every public and private good, I assure myself that it expresses your sentiments not less than my own, nor those of my fellow-citizens at large less than either. No people can be bound to acknowledge and adore the Invisible Hand which conducts the affairs of men more than those of the United States. Every step by which they have advanced to the character of an independent nation seems to have been distinguished by some token of providential agency; and in the important revolution just accomplished in the system of their united government the tranquil deliberations and voluntary consent of so many distinct communities from which the event has resulted can not be compared with the means by which most governments have been established without some return of pious gratitude, along with an humble anticipation of the future blessings which the past seem to presage. These reflections, arising out of the present crisis, have forced themselves too strongly on my mind to be suppressed. You will join with me, I trust, in thinking that there are none under the influence of which the proceedings of a new and free government can more auspiciously commence"

    "Having thus imparted to you my sentiments as they have been awakened by the occasion which brings us together, I shall take my present leave; but not without resorting once more to the benign Parent of the Human Race in humble supplication that, since He has been pleased to favor the American people with opportunities for deliberating in perfect tranquillity, and dispositions for deciding with unparalleled unanimity on a form of government for the security of their union and the advancement of their happiness, so His divine blessing may be equally conspicuous in the enlarged views, the temperate consultations, and the wise measures on which the success of this Government must depend."

    Before he gave this address he took the oath of of prescribed by the US Constitution. To the oath he added the words "So help me God."

    I will add 1 small comment, those terms used by Washington were terms commonly used by the Christian preachers of the time to refer to God. The same God that Papa Benedetto or Billy Graham would be refering to today.

     

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

LifeSiteNews.com Headlines

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Get this widget!
Visit the Widget Gallery
FaithMouse