How Twisted & Perverted Out Educational System Has Gotten
This is allowed at a public school:
Sex education starts early, especially if you go to elementary school in Provincetown, Mass.
That’s because the school committee has unanimously adopted a condom distribution policy beginning as early as first grade.
According to the Provincetown Banner, the program requires that students speak to a school nurse or trained counselor before receiving condoms.
The committee also directed school leaders not to honor demands from parents who object to their kids receiving protection. This is plain & simple undermining of parental authority. & this is exactly the kind of thing that Planned Parenthood loves to promote.
That’s because the school committee has unanimously adopted a condom distribution policy beginning as early as first grade.
According to the Provincetown Banner, the program requires that students speak to a school nurse or trained counselor before receiving condoms.
The committee also directed school leaders not to honor demands from parents who object to their kids receiving protection. This is plain & simple undermining of parental authority. & this is exactly the kind of thing that Planned Parenthood loves to promote.
Some members on the committee were wary because the program requires that students speak to school officials first.
But Beth Singer, the school’s superintendent, said she wanted to guarantee younger students get information on how to use condoms because there is no age limit. Dr. Singer might do well to be more concerned about the fact that enrollment is dropping at the system she is in charge of. maybe 1 of the rasons is that parents are tired of their rights being stomped on instead of the reasons given in the article. I also wonder how big of a supporter of PP she & aother board members are because, as I pointed out above, this is right in line w/ PP's agenda.
“We’re talking about younger kids,” said Singer. “They have questions they need answered on how to use them, when to use them.” Like I said, right out of PP's playbook.
But Beth Singer, the school’s superintendent, said she wanted to guarantee younger students get information on how to use condoms because there is no age limit. Dr. Singer might do well to be more concerned about the fact that enrollment is dropping at the system she is in charge of. maybe 1 of the rasons is that parents are tired of their rights being stomped on instead of the reasons given in the article. I also wonder how big of a supporter of PP she & aother board members are because, as I pointed out above, this is right in line w/ PP's agenda.
“We’re talking about younger kids,” said Singer. “They have questions they need answered on how to use them, when to use them.” Like I said, right out of PP's playbook.
H/T: Jill Stanek (Public school sex ed gone wild: condoms for 1st graders; stuffed animal sex)
Or this from the '"telemed abortion" pushing gang of Planned Parenthood-Heartland here in Iowa (another infamia that tarnishes the good name of Iowa) :
The group's teen page, meanwhile, teaches visitors "all about the anus" and lauds the health benefits of masturbation.
By Kathleen Gilbert
SHENANDOAH, Iowa, June 24, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Parents in Southwest Iowa have reacted in horror after learning that Planned Parenthood's co-ed sex education course not only used pornographic teaching materials but also taught children sexual positions.
Colleen Dostal told Fox News Radio, after discovering that her 14-year-old son had been taught sexual positions using stuffed animals meant to represent STDs, that the class was "horribly inappropriate."
“I do not understand why any adult with a classroom of children would show them sexual positions,” she told Fox.
Dostal said the class also included directions on performing female exams and used an anatomically correct model of a male sex organ to explain how to use a condom.
The parents said the school's principal was "mortified" when told the content of the class and apologized. Mortified about the content, or that PP got outed. Anyone who is familiar w/ PP knows this is typical for their sex-ed speakers. (See below for link to PP webpages that back this up.) Several other parents complained to school superintendent Dick Profit. Profit, however, claimed he had received equal numbers of calls supporting and opposing the explicit sex-ed, according to the World Herald.
Speaking for Planned Parenthood, Jennifer Horner defended the curriculum as giving children "accurate" information. As Jill Stanek points out in her post about this that "accurate" info includes redefining abstinence to mean using a condom. ""The definition we give is abstinence is refraining from any activity that puts you at risk for a sexually transmitted infection or pregnancy." using a condom would definitely fit into that definition despite Horner's claims to the contrary. She also claims that abortions "makes up only about 1 percent of the services they provide." As anyone who has studied PP knows, they twist the numbers to enable them to make claims like this. In her case, I suspect she is refering to surgical abortions as opposed to their "telemed" ones. & the fact that they count the same person more than once by making it look like they are different persons for each service probably is another part of that twisting.
SHENANDOAH, Iowa, June 24, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Parents in Southwest Iowa have reacted in horror after learning that Planned Parenthood's co-ed sex education course not only used pornographic teaching materials but also taught children sexual positions.
Colleen Dostal told Fox News Radio, after discovering that her 14-year-old son had been taught sexual positions using stuffed animals meant to represent STDs, that the class was "horribly inappropriate."
“I do not understand why any adult with a classroom of children would show them sexual positions,” she told Fox.
Dostal said the class also included directions on performing female exams and used an anatomically correct model of a male sex organ to explain how to use a condom.
The parents said the school's principal was "mortified" when told the content of the class and apologized. Mortified about the content, or that PP got outed. Anyone who is familiar w/ PP knows this is typical for their sex-ed speakers. (See below for link to PP webpages that back this up.) Several other parents complained to school superintendent Dick Profit. Profit, however, claimed he had received equal numbers of calls supporting and opposing the explicit sex-ed, according to the World Herald.
Speaking for Planned Parenthood, Jennifer Horner defended the curriculum as giving children "accurate" information. As Jill Stanek points out in her post about this that "accurate" info includes redefining abstinence to mean using a condom. ""The definition we give is abstinence is refraining from any activity that puts you at risk for a sexually transmitted infection or pregnancy." using a condom would definitely fit into that definition despite Horner's claims to the contrary. She also claims that abortions "makes up only about 1 percent of the services they provide." As anyone who has studied PP knows, they twist the numbers to enable them to make claims like this. In her case, I suspect she is refering to surgical abortions as opposed to their "telemed" ones. & the fact that they count the same person more than once by making it look like they are different persons for each service probably is another part of that twisting.
"We are not trying to keep any of this a secret. All information we use is medically accurate and science based," she said. This has been disproven by Live Action & others. PP doesn't give out accurate info.
Planned Parenthood's extremely explicit take on teen sex-ed is evident from the "Teen Talk" section of their website, a series of pages decorated with images of heterosexual and homosexual intimacy, which leads youngsters to a wealth of information on deviant sexual practices.
One page entitled "All about the anus: how much do you really know about your anus?" gives explicit details on anal penetration as a source of sexual pleasure and "as a way to preserve the woman's virginity." While noting that anal penetration "is, of course, high risk for HIV," PP advocates using condoms or "Sheer Glyde dams" to protect against the fatal virus.
Elsewhere, Planned Parenthood dedicates a web page to advocating masturbation as "safe and healthy, and it's here to stay." The article hails the painkilling and stress-relieving qualities of masturbation, and assures that it's "fine" to do so several times a day.
Planned Parenthood's extremely explicit take on teen sex-ed is evident from the "Teen Talk" section of their website, a series of pages decorated with images of heterosexual and homosexual intimacy, which leads youngsters to a wealth of information on deviant sexual practices.
One page entitled "All about the anus: how much do you really know about your anus?" gives explicit details on anal penetration as a source of sexual pleasure and "as a way to preserve the woman's virginity." While noting that anal penetration "is, of course, high risk for HIV," PP advocates using condoms or "Sheer Glyde dams" to protect against the fatal virus.
Elsewhere, Planned Parenthood dedicates a web page to advocating masturbation as "safe and healthy, and it's here to stay." The article hails the painkilling and stress-relieving qualities of masturbation, and assures that it's "fine" to do so several times a day.
Sad, sick & perverted. & the norm for PP. & something way too many educators approve of. & support Pp for doing.
But as this video report tells us there are certain things that these same so called education experts think are too dangerous for children to be exposed to:
H/T: Rick (Imagine What Teachers are Showing their Students )
Yup, those documents that make the United States what we are & teach us what it truly means to be a real American, & are the 1st things our children should be learning are being labelled as dangerous. This fits in to what I pointed out 2 weeks ago about the publishing house that is putting warning labels on these same documents.
Something tells me that the way things are in education today isn't the way John Adams envisioned things when he said "Laws for the liberal education of the youth, especially of the lower class of the people, are so extremely wise and useful, that, to a humane and generous mind, no expense for this purpose would be thought extravagant." (Thoughts on Government, 1776)
Labels: Planned Parenthood
posted by Al @ 2:33 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home