Reading This Sent a Chill Down My Spine
Medical Journal Blames Disabled People "who want to live" for Confusion on Assisted Suicide Debate
By Hilary White
LONDON, August 31, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - An editorial appearing in the prestigious British Medical Journal (BMJ) has blamed disabled people "who want to live" for the difficulties surrounding the debate in the UK on assisted suicide. Tony Delamothe, deputy editor of the BMJ, bluntly admitted that he is in favour of assisted suicide.
"The debate on assisted dying has been hijacked by disabled people who want to live. It needs to be reclaimed for terminally ill people who want to die," he wrote.
Led by Baroness Jane Campbell, a disabled member of the House of Lords, the disability campaigners have stood in the way of those who "rationally" choose to die, rather than endure their conditions. Delamothe objected to the argument that a change in the law would undermine the rights of vulnerable people.
"The rights?" Delamothe asks. "I understand that changing the law might mean that some people could feel under some obligation to bring about their premature end to avoid being a burden to others - and that severely disabled people might feel this more than most. But should such a risk override the freedom of competent terminally ill people to bring about their own end at a time of their choosing?"
Delamothe quotes Baroness Warnock, the doyenne of British utilitarian bioethics philosophers, calling her intervention a response to the "sloppy thinking" of the pro-life position. Warnock said, "There are two different concepts," terminal illness and disability, which should not be put together under the "general heading of the vulnerable about whom we hear, in my experience, all too much".
Delamothe responds, "I hope Baroness Warnock lives for ever, although I know that she does not want to."
Currently in Britain it is an offence punishable by a possible 14 years in prison to assist a person to commit suicide. The law, however, is under attack and last month the House of Lords judicial committee ordered the public prosecutors to "clarify" the terms under which it would be enforced.
Also in July, Baroness Campbell gave a powerful speech in the House of Lords that was credited with squashing an amendment to the coroners and justice bill that would have taken Britain one step closer to legalising assisted suicide. Meanwhile, the effort to change the law continues by a cadre of experienced and powerful government insiders.
Read related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
LONDON, August 31, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - An editorial appearing in the prestigious British Medical Journal (BMJ) has blamed disabled people "who want to live" for the difficulties surrounding the debate in the UK on assisted suicide. Tony Delamothe, deputy editor of the BMJ, bluntly admitted that he is in favour of assisted suicide.
"The debate on assisted dying has been hijacked by disabled people who want to live. It needs to be reclaimed for terminally ill people who want to die," he wrote.
Led by Baroness Jane Campbell, a disabled member of the House of Lords, the disability campaigners have stood in the way of those who "rationally" choose to die, rather than endure their conditions. Delamothe objected to the argument that a change in the law would undermine the rights of vulnerable people.
"The rights?" Delamothe asks. "I understand that changing the law might mean that some people could feel under some obligation to bring about their premature end to avoid being a burden to others - and that severely disabled people might feel this more than most. But should such a risk override the freedom of competent terminally ill people to bring about their own end at a time of their choosing?"
Delamothe quotes Baroness Warnock, the doyenne of British utilitarian bioethics philosophers, calling her intervention a response to the "sloppy thinking" of the pro-life position. Warnock said, "There are two different concepts," terminal illness and disability, which should not be put together under the "general heading of the vulnerable about whom we hear, in my experience, all too much".
Delamothe responds, "I hope Baroness Warnock lives for ever, although I know that she does not want to."
Currently in Britain it is an offence punishable by a possible 14 years in prison to assist a person to commit suicide. The law, however, is under attack and last month the House of Lords judicial committee ordered the public prosecutors to "clarify" the terms under which it would be enforced.
Also in July, Baroness Campbell gave a powerful speech in the House of Lords that was credited with squashing an amendment to the coroners and justice bill that would have taken Britain one step closer to legalising assisted suicide. Meanwhile, the effort to change the law continues by a cadre of experienced and powerful government insiders.
Read related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
_________________
This guy should have his medical licence taken away. This is just sick & shows how little he cares about the people he should be concerned with. He is a prime example of ice water in the veins. As I type this I am trying so hard not to see red. & it is hard. He blows off the concerns of the disabled because he thinks a few of them being pressured into suicide is an OK price to pay to allow people to commit suicide. A doctor is supposed to have compassion. This guy has none.
posted by Al @ 3:12 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home