Is Anybody There?

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Not by might, nor by power, but by my Spirit,' says Yahweh Sabaoth" Zach 4:6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dio di Signore, nella Sua volontà è nostra pace!" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Ben Franklin 1759

Wednesday, October 08, 2008

Opponants to Amendment 48 Shows Their Lack of Logic

(This was taken from the 7 October 2008 e-mail from Survivors of the Abortion Holocaust:
Colorado's Personhood Amendment (48)
And the faith of the pro-aborts!


The state of Colorado will soon be voting on Amendment 48, The Personhood Amendment. From the Colorado for Equal Rights website:
"The Personhood Amendment will see that the Colorado state constitution is amended to include pre-born from the moment of fertilization as having their 'personhood' clearly established, so that they may enjoy inalienable rights, equality of justice and equal protection under the law."
Now, it's important to clarify that the Personhood Amendment does not change the constitution in any way. It merely clarifies the definition of a 'person' as beginning at fertilization. Medical textbooks and scientific reference works consistently agree that human life begins at conception. This means that the moment an egg is fertilized by a sperm, it brings into existence a zygote, which is a genetically distinct human being. This isn't biased information. These are basic, indisputable biological facts that have been affirmed by medical professionals worldwide for decades.
With the tantrums being thrown by pro-aborts, it's amazing to think that this 'attack on women's health', as they deem it, is merely an attempt to keep our laws updated with modern science. Establishing medical facts pertaining to the development of the preborn is no more an attack on women's health than challenging the flat earth theory is an attack on nautical travel.
We would do well to remind our pro-abort friends who love to paint themselves as the picture of modern progression, that to ignore the advance of medical science is archaic, antediluvian, and (dare we say it?) intolerant.
For a group of people who love to discredit their opposition by claiming to be above uninformed, religious opinion, it's amazing to watch their persistent ignorance to the basic biological and medical facts of prenatal development. Who would have thought that in the 21st century, fairly intelligent individuals would persist in rejecting science, in the face of strong evidence, so that they can sit back comfortably in their subjective, faith-based worldview that killing a child is the equivalent of pulling a tooth?
Seriously, just think about what voting No on Amendment 48 entails. What you are being asked to do is to ignore the advancements of medical and biological science to placate the subjective political opinions and faith based claims of a group of individuals. According to the American Heritage Dictionary, the definition of "Faith" is, "Belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence." Since the statement, "a fetus isn't a child" is not based on any tangible data, and in fact goes contrary to all established evidence - it is quite literally a faith statement. It is an opinion. It is not grounded in reality.
When you listen to pro-aborts sputtering out nonsense about "a fetus is just a formless blob", "it's the woman's body", etc.. you are listening to faith statements that directly oppose the most fundamental precepts of medical knowledge. You must willingly adopt ignorance and become intellectually handicapped to believe the faith statements dehumanizing the fetus. And they call us the extremists?
What kind of sad society is it where the self-appointed intellectual elite are in essence saying, "The Personhood Amendment, where accepting the facts of elementary school science make you an extremist!"
The question of when life begins isn't relative. It is clearly definable in terms of science. To keep a belief grounded in the elusive playground of 'what's right for me' is not progressive. It does not a benefit womens health. The only way anyone can justify voting no on 48, is to deny the medical facts, or to admit that abortion is the act of ending a human life. Not too many individuals seem to be overly fond of openly admitting support for mass child murder, so anti-life groups like Planned Parenthood and NARAL are ready to spew out lies and deceptions to prevent Colorado from catching up with fifth grade biology.
This really is an intellectual war. Not counting Colorado pro-lifers, you have to realize that your state is essentially made up of two groups of people. Those who are uninformed or misinformed when it comes to the medical facts of personhood, and those who remain willfully ignorant of the medical facts of personhood. One group is being deceived by the other.
Your job as an activist taking a stand for life is to clear the fog. Tell it like it is. This is literally a case of faith vs. science. And since our opposition pride themselves on being scientifically savvy and morally progressive, let's ask them: If you are so progressive and science-minded, then why are you opposed to catching our laws up to date with medical science?
Be blunt. Be bold. Write letters to the editor. Challenge advertisements and opinion columns that are openly stating falsehoods and anti-life fabrications. Get the word out. Here's the nitty-gritty: Like toddler and adolescent, the terms embryo and fetus do not refer to nonhumans, but to humans at particular stages of development. And stage of development does not alter human worth. The pre-born are undeniably human and as such deserve equal rights. It really is that simple!
As pro-life activists, it is irritating lacking the funds to get the truth out, especially when we're up against a behemoth of lies. However, unlike our opposition, we don't have to exhaust our limited resources in fixing up lies into believable little pills for the public to swallow. All we have to do is tell it like it is. Let's remove politics and religion from the equation and look at this for what it is.. the acknowledgment of established biological fact.
I know I've repeated this to the point of redundancy, but this is the only way we'll get through to the masses: We play by their rules. You want to protect women? You despise primitive faith-based rhetoric? Good! The hypocrisy stops here. Let's close our Bibles and open our biology textbooks. Modern science is very clear and concise on when human life begins. Once the fog is cleared, I think the masses will agree.. in light of medical science I personally don't have enough faith to pretend that a preborn child is the equivalent of a pulled tooth.
- Gingi Edmonds

7 Comments:

  • At 9/10/08 12:17 AM , Blogger sufimarie said...

    I thought you may have something to say but you dont. I stopped reading after the first two sentences where you quote their site.

    I am here to point out the obvious to you which is
    amending the Constitution
    =
    changing the Constitution. DUH


    So now the title of your post should read Proponents to Amendment 48 (repeatedly) Show Their Lack of Logic.


    But I know you are too cowardly to post this comment so FLIBBERTY FLABBERTY JIBBERT AND FEAR.

     
  • At 10/10/08 1:57 AM , Blogger Al said...

    Thank you for proving the author's point by your very actions.

    AlSO, it is quite apparent that you approve of the murder of over 3200 unborn children EVERY DAY VIA ABORTION.

    & apparently you don't know me very well, I am not afraid to post comments of those who attempt to attack me, even when all they end up doing is embarrass themselves by proving how childish & immature they are, like you did.

     
  • At 10/10/08 8:49 AM , Blogger sufimarie said...

    How old is the earth?

     
  • At 11/10/08 12:18 AM , Blogger Al said...

    Thank you for once again proving my point. Now if you can offer a serious rebuttal to the author's arguments, please do, otherwise quite acting like a spoiled brat.

    Thank you.

     
  • At 11/10/08 1:45 AM , Blogger sufimarie said...

    No, seriously! How old do you think the earth is? If you answer the way you want to but are afraid to, there is no need to have any further discussion. You cannot have a conversation with someone with whom there is not even the slightest amount of common ground. Why is it that those who deny evolution are the least evolved?

     
  • At 11/10/08 1:45 AM , Blogger sufimarie said...

    And you misspelled the title.

     
  • At 11/10/08 1:59 AM , Blogger Al said...

    1. What does how old I think the Earth is have to do with the facts of life? You are trying to use your "smoke & mirrors" insults to avoid actually debating this issue.

    2. The same point applies to your bringing up my mispelling a word.

    The facts are, you know you can't win the argument in an honest debate, so you resort to insults & name calling. I'm sure it makes you feel superior. Well, unlike you, I don't need to feel superior by tearing other people down. In fact, I pity you for feeling that the only way you can win is by tearing people down.

    At this point, unless you can actually come up with a valid counterargument to the what Ms. Edmonds said, I will no longer publish your comments. & don't say it is cowardice, you are the 1 who has been showing cowardice by the name calling rather than taking part in an honest debate.

     

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

LifeSiteNews.com Headlines

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Get this widget!
Visit the Widget Gallery
FaithMouse